Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Khumoun Sultanov vs Mirza Basic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sultanov vs Basic analysis and find out who is favored!
Khumoun Sultanov vs Mirza Basic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sultanov has won 54.85% of points on his second serve, while Basic has won 54.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sultanov, in recent form, has won 55.99% of his opponent's second serve points, while Basic has won 49.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.22% and 30.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sultanov has saved 57.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Basic has saved 53.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sultanov has won 69.44% of matches played (W/L 50/ 22), with Basic winning 57.14% (W/L 24/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sultanov has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 100% (W/L 1/ 0), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 69/ 55). Basic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 140/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 14/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Sultanov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.6% of matches (W/L 47/ 16), where as Basic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 19/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sultanov winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sultanov winning 2 and Basic winning 0. The last match between Sultanov and Basic was at the M15 Doha, 10-01-2024, First, Hard with Khumoun Sultanov getting the victory 7-6(3) 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sultanov and Basic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sultanov winning 0 times and Basic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Sultanov winning 2, and Basic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sultanov has played against opponents with an average rank of 185.53 while Basic has played against players with an average rank of 262.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sultanov has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Basic has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sultanov has converted 45.7% of breakpoint opportunities, and Basic has converted 38.21% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sultanov 1 - 0 Basic
339
Rank
299
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
699
Rank
74
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
60% (239-160)
Career Total W/L
56% (468-364)
76% (26-8)
YTD W/L
55% (11-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$478,883
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Khumoun Sultanov | Mirza Basic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:10:0 | 2:10:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (57/78) | 70% (64/92) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (34/57) | 58% (37/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (14/21) | 57% (16/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 80% (4/5) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (39/92) | 38% (30/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Mirza Basic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Khumoun Sultanov | Mirza Basic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 76% (26/8) | 55% (11/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 72% (56/22) | 57% (24/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (401/303) | 52% (220/202) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 79% (23/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 71% (5/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 130 | 73 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:51 | 1:36:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 174.94 | 89.1 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1297/2084) | 68% (880/1289) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (879/1297) | 71% (622/880) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (433/787) | 54% (221/409) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (121/272) | 38% (47/123) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (992/2229) | 38% (525/1396) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 79% (26/7) | 61% (11/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 76% (26/34) | 50% (9/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (9/9) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (26/22) | 79% (14/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (26/4) | 21% (14/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (8/4) | 0% (6/0) |
Khumoun Sultanov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
88%
(
46 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Josip Simundza
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
74
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Paul Woerner
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Filippo Romano
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
75 of
122)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
122)
110
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
1-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Andriy Poritskyy
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
97%
(
29 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Saba Purtseladze
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Amr Elsayed
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
11
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
7
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
73
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mirza Basic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Arthur Laborde
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Josip Simundza
Player
Mirza Basic
71%
(
92 of
129)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
38%
(
49 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
109
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Marin Bradaric
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve %
85%
(
22 of
26)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
25
Total Points Won
19
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Mirza Basic
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Alen Bill
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Mirza Basic
70%
(
77 of
110)
1st Serve %
65%
(
81 of
124)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
60 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
37 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
124)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Sean Hess
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Mili Poljicak
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
20 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Marino Jakic
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
51%
(
49 of
96)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Nicod
Player
Mirza Basic
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sultanov Vs Basic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mirza Basic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
